Progressivism: A Very Short Definition

Literacy and numeracy don't grow in the hedgerows.

Literacy and numeracy don’t grow in the hedgerows.

There are two key mantras of progressive dogma: naturalism and formalism.

Naturalism is the idea that education happens naturally, like the growth of a plant, and teachers need to stand back and let it unfurl.

Formalism is the idea that factual knowledge is unimportant; it is transferable skills that count.

Naturalism is plausible because it does describe the way we learn our mother tongue. But it is wrong because there is nothing natural about the acquisition of literacy, numeracy or academic subject knowledge. You could stare at a tree your whole life without ever learning about photosynthesis. The human race existed for many generations before the alphabet or base ten mathematics were even invented.

Formalism is plausible because there is such a thing as general skill in reading and picking up new skills with facility. Formalism is wrong because this general facility is based on good general knowledge. It is also wrong because specific skills always require specific knowledge. Experts are experts because they know a lot about their subject; it is novices who must look things up, and this prevents them from thinking efficiently. In order to think like an expert, you need expertise, which means large amounts of knowledge at your fingertips.

(See E D Hirsch, The Schools We Need, p218-222, for more detailed and eloquent definitions and refutations).


11 thoughts on “Progressivism: A Very Short Definition

  1. Pingback: How I Survived Teacher Training | The Traditional Teacher

  2. Pingback: Grinning Pupils in Glossy Brochures | The Traditional Teacher

  3. Pingback: Can Research Happen at School? | The Traditional Teacher

  4. Pingback: Memorising Poetry | The Traditional Teacher

  5. Pingback: Uprooting Bad Ideas in Education | The Traditional Teacher

  6. Pingback: The Uses of General Knowledge Quizzes | The Traditional Teacher

  7. Pingback: “He really struggles with . . . “ | The Traditional Teacher

  8. Pingback: Engelmann’s Direct Instruction: I’m a Convert | The Traditional Teacher

  9. Pingback: Against Analysis, or Why William Doesn’t Engage the Reader | The Traditional Teacher

Thoughtful and reasonable discussion is always welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s