Why Do People Hate Free Schools?

Michael Gove in 2010

Michael Gove in 2010

The free school policy has been a central area of controversy in the education world. When I first heard about it in the run up to the 2010 election, it immediately appealed to me. I was so pleased to hear a politician talking about handing some control of their own money back to taxpayers, and trusting parents more with decisions about their own child’s education. It just seemed like common sense. I’ve been surprised in the last five years at how much vitriol has been poured on the initiative. Why is it that there are so many vocal and bitter opponents of free schools?

Firstly, it must be admitted that there are bad free schools, in case anyone thinks I am suggesting that it is a magic bullet for transforming education. There are bad schools of every type in existence. That in itself proves nothing, any more than meeting a rude Frenchman means I should conclude that the whole nation lacks manners.

Having studied the background to the policy, and looked at how similar initiatives have played out in the USA, I’ve concluded that the hatred for free schools derives chiefly from political ideology, not educational theory. But of course, the two are very much entangled in public education policy.

Free schools are perceived by many on the left as a kind of privatisation, because they reduce the role of government officials in the provision of education. It is odd that so many on the left have such a naive trust in the effectiveness of unelected bureaucrats, believing that they are the professionals, and the groups of parents and teachers aiming to set up free schools are amateurs, who can’t possibly be trusted with public money. Parents happen to know quite a lot about children actually, possibly a bit more than a twenty-two year old fresh from a programme of progressive indoctrination (also known as a PGCE).

Then there is the horror at the permission to employ ‘unqualified’ teachers. Given the current dominance of anti-educational ideas on most teacher training courses, this is another blow to those who wish to keep our education system dumbed down and patronisingly adapted to what is ‘relevant’ to the disadvantaged.

And of course the teaching unions hate the free school policy, because it allows headteachers more power to set pay and conditions, and even, horror of horrors, to remove an incompetent member of staff. Here we have a measure of local, personal accountability being introduced to a profession in which virtually none existed before, and I suppose that is always going to make some people uncomfortable.

Actually, it seems to me that Gove knew his enemies when he initiated this policy. He had read his E D Hirsch, and he knew that until the power centres of progressive ideology were undermined, there would be little progress towards a proper education for all. Those power centres are local education authorities, university education departments and teaching unions. The growth of free schools and academies significantly undermines the stifling grip of all three.

It may be that there will come a day when we can rebuild our education system in a more systematic way based on a consensus in favour of actually teaching children something. But right now, education is a battleground, and a certain amount of creative destruction is necessary before we can move forward.

(Image from Wikimedia).


6 thoughts on “Why Do People Hate Free Schools?

  1. I too, thought that the free schools idea might have been a good one. However, after having read up a little more about the ones that have been accepted and actually having been part of a free school bid (I quit after realising all the drama and hoop jumping surrounding it all), I realise that they (and this government) will never be supportive of progressive education, even though there are so many people/institutions who wish to try and educate in a creative, thoughtful way. This is a shame, since the initial idea seemed so forward thinking and exciting.


    • One of the main points of the free school initiative was to undermine progressive education, which has been dominant for so long and failed to many generations of children, and allow some traditional common sense to flourish instead.

      Liked by 1 person

      • What happened before was not pure progressive education – it was not as innovative or creative as it could have been, so we didn’t really get to see if progressive education really worked at all.


  2. Steiner Schools, Summerhill, Dartington and most of ILEA schools were progressive with illiteracy rates rising to 40%. Maybe with inspirational teaching miracles can happen but gov. priority should be to provide knowledge-based education for all children, including the disadvantaged.

    Liked by 2 people

Thoughtful and reasonable discussion is always welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s