Grey Suit Is Gonna Get You

Grey SuitI didn’t own a suit until I needed to buy one for my wedding day, and I was rather proud of myself. I had grown up despising ceremony and insisting that it impeded genuine personal expression. I had grown up under the spell of Romanticism, and had I known much about Rousseau, would probably have considered myself a rather noble savage. Even with my suit, I wore Dr Marten boots, and the wedding was a minimal registry office affair.

But despite all of my sub-Romantic ideology, I learned something that day. The ceremony did make a difference, and the part that made the biggest difference was the part that was fixed, the part which was nothing to do with self-expression. After years of sneering at ceremony, I had glimpsed civilisation. I had learned that there was something other than individualism or conformity.

I was struck yesterday by a comment on a blog post about behaviour, in which a teacher described formerly rebellious pupils who had finally got a decent haircut and some smart clothes after years of sloppiness in school: they wanted to get a job. Here we have the two poles of modern experience: anarchic individualism on the one hand, and grey conformity on the other. It is all in Rousseau: the savage has the pleasures of the natural life, but society demands that he surrender them in exchange for material prosperity and safety. Once he has conformed, he will still long for the state of nature. There is a fundamental contradiction between nature and society according to Rousseau, and the only two options are antinomian separation and grey, slavish submission.

So is that all we can hope for? Is there nothing better than pragmatic surrender to the inevitable? Is the grey suit the noblest garment that modern man can wear? Certainly if you look at male teachers nowadays, the grey suit is becoming ever more ubiquitous.

The twentieth century was a schizophrenic century, its split personality divided between the cane and conformity prior to the sixties, and the anarchy of self-expression afterwards. Are we moving back to the fifties? C S Lewis wrote in 1943 that ‘the task of the modern educator is not to cut down jungles but to irrigate deserts’ (The Abolition of Man). If we tell our pupils that the point of education is merely to achieve material prosperity, we’re back in the desert again, after spending a few decades in the jungle. Is there no temperate climate for us to inhabit?

The answer lies at least partly in the academic gown. I have written before about why academic gowns should be brought back. The key idea here is that of the dignity of knowledge, which has nothing to do with the personality of the knower, which is entirely outside of himself, objective and external. A gown expresses the dignity of office, not the personal taste of the wearer. By definition, the wearing of gowns cannot be restored by individual teachers. It must be a corporate decision, so that it does not become yet another marker of individual choice.

If teachers were gowned, they would point by their very physical presence to something higher than mere conformity to practical necessity. They would be a sign of hope for escape from the solipsistic, narcissistic culture which offers only two types of prison to our young people. They would point to the belief of every generation prior to the modern era, that civilised society can contribute to man’s perfection.

(Image from Wikimedia).


6 thoughts on “Grey Suit Is Gonna Get You

  1. Corporal punishment was not outlawed in UK state schools until 1987 (and in private schools from 1999 onwards). It was very much a feature of my state school education in the 1970’s and 80’s, along with an expectation of complete conformity.


  2. I think a bit of conformity is really just a bit of growing up; you realise that you have responsibilities, and one of those responsibilities is about setting an example and not looking like a slob.

    I like a suit. Firstly, the British invented it. Secondly, it does confer an element of authority to the wearer which is helpful for teaching. Thirdly, people respect the wearer of the suit a little more (except if they are a bit childish) because he has made an effort. The Suit is part of the common language of clothing that conveys a message of the serious, pragmatic, trustworthy, intellectual and the nature of authority and wisdom. These are good qualities.

    I have no idea why Sue felt the need to bring up corporal punishment. Completely unnecessary.

    Now that I am older and wiser, I understand the value of a bit of conformity. I’m not sure we need to go to gowns, although I do understand that they convey an additional message which I can only describe as ‘font of knowledge’. Yes, I agree that academic pursuit, rather than the childish pursuit of happiness so regularly dispatched in classrooms up and down our country, should be the ultimate aim of education. However, I do think that a bit of reality should be allowed a look in; most children will end up getting a job at some point!


    • I too like suits and I wear one to work. Looking serious and professional is certainly better than trying to get down with the kids. But gowns go one step further, towards something higher to which we should be aspiring.

      Likewise, conformity is far superior to self-indulgent individualism. It can be the first step towards the pursuit of truth which lies outside the ego, which is external and objective. The problem is that people stop there, and fail to perceive that there might be a deeper reason for overcoming our selfish desires beyond mere pragmatic necessity.

      Liked by 1 person

Thoughtful and reasonable discussion is always welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s